Obligations / Indonesia

What a company files in Indonesia [ID]

Every entry below is the rule as Indonesia publishes it. It is a reference, not a calendar: where a deadline runs from something only you know, this page says so instead of showing a date.

A template, not your deadline

This is the rule as published by the registry, checked against the primary source on the date shown. It is not your filing date. Where a deadline runs from incorporation, from a fiscal year the company itself elects, or from an event only you know about, no date can be derived here at all — the figure you see is the formula, not the answer. Extensions, transitional regimes and entity-specific exemptions are not reflected. Confirm with the registry before you rely on a date.

How the financial year is set — Chosen by the company

The company chooses its own year, and that choice is the reason three of the six duties below carry a formula instead of a date. Article 1, number 8 of the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (UU KUP) puts it in one sentence: «Tahun Pajak adalah jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun kalender kecuali bila Wajib Pajak menggunakan tahun buku yang tidak sama dengan tahun kalender» — the Tax Year is a calendar year, unless the taxpayer uses a book year that is not the same as the calendar year. So the calendar year is the default and not the rule: a company that keeps its books to another cycle is taxed on that cycle, and the same law speaks of a «bagian Tahun Pajak», a part-year, for a period shorter than twelve months. The Company Law (UU 40/2007) counts its own deadlines from the end of the «tahun buku» but, on the articles read, does not define the term and does not say where it is fixed; nothing read states that the two years must coincide, and nothing read states that they may differ, so neither is asserted here. The consequence for this page is concrete. The annual income tax return, the annual report to the general meeting and the audit of the financial statements are all counted from the end of that year, and none of them can be printed as a calendar date until the company says which year it keeps. The three duties that do not depend on it are the two VAT duties, which run from the end of each monthly tax period, and the beneficial owner update, which runs from the company's own last filing.

Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan, UU 6/1983 as last amended), article 1 number 8: «Tahun Pajak adalah jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun kalender kecuali bila Wajib Pajak menggunakan tahun buku yang tidak sama dengan tahun kalender». Consolidated text (Susunan dalam Satu Naskah) published by the Directorate General of Taxes (Direktorat Jenderal Pajak), Ministry of Finance, the tax authority itself. The term «tahun buku» used by the Company Law (Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas) is not defined in the articles of that law that were read, at https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/29563/UU%20Nomor%2040%20Tahun%202007.pdf · checked 2026-10-12

Annual corporate income tax return (Surat Pemberitahuan Tahunan Pajak Penghasilan Wajib Pajak badan)

Formula, not a date
Filed to
The Directorate General of Taxes (Direktorat Jenderal Pajak), the tax authority within the Ministry of Finance, through the tax office at which the company is registered and through the authority's electronic filing service. The tax itself is not paid to the authority but to the state treasury through an appointed bank or post office, and the order of the two steps is fixed by law rather than by practice: article 9 paragraph (2) requires that any shortfall shown by the return «harus dibayar lunas sebelum Surat Pemberitahuan Pajak Penghasilan disampaikan» — be paid in full before the return is filed.
Who it applies to
Every entity in the jurisdiction
Every corporate taxpayer files, and nothing in the provisions read sets a turnover floor below which the annual return is not due. The duty follows from being a «Wajib Pajak badan» — a corporate taxpayer — and article 3 paragraph (3) letter c states the deadline for that class without any qualification by size, sector or result. A year that ends in a loss does not by itself remove the filing. Two things the articles read do not settle, and neither is asserted here. The first is the position of a company that has been struck off the register of taxpayers or whose registration has been revoked, because the deadline provision addresses taxpayers and not the act of deregistration. The second is the treatment of a part-year — the law's «bagian Tahun Pajak» — for a company incorporated or liquidated mid-year: the term exists in the law, but the articles read do not state how the four-month count applies to it.
Deadline
Within 4 months after the end of the financial year.
Extensions and exceptions: An extension of up to two months is available as of right, by notice rather than by permission, but it is not free. Article 3 paragraph (4) lets the taxpayer extend the filing period «untuk paling lama 2 (dua) bulan dengan cara menyampaikan pemberitahuan secara tertulis atau dengan cara lain kepada Direktur Jenderal Pajak» — for at most two months, by giving written notice or notice in another manner to the Director General of Taxes, on terms set by regulation of the Minister of Finance. The price of that extension is set in the next paragraph: article 3 paragraph (5) requires the notice to be accompanied by «penghitungan sementara pajak yang terutang dalam 1 (satu) Tahun Pajak» — a provisional computation of the tax due for the year — and by the payment slip evidencing settlement of the shortfall. In other words the filing moves and the money does not. Interest under article 9 paragraph (2b) runs from the end of the filing period to the date of payment, so an extension taken without paying the provisional amount buys time at a monthly cost.
No date can be derived here. This deadline runs from something this page does not know — the financial year the company itself elects, or an event only you can date. What is published is the rule, not the day.
If missed
Two sanctions run in parallel and only one of them is a figure. The flat fine is in article 7 paragraph (1): a return filed after the deadline of article 3 paragraph (3) or after the extended deadline of article 3 paragraph (4) draws an administrative fine «sebesar Rp1.000.000,00 (satu juta rupiah) untuk Surat Pemberitahuan Tahunan Pajak Penghasilan Wajib Pajak badan» — one million rupiah for a corporate annual income tax return. That amount is recorded below. The second sanction is interest on late payment, and no monthly figure is asserted here because the law no longer contains one. The earlier text of article 9 paragraph (2a) set interest at two per cent a month; in the consolidated text published by the tax authority the rate is instead «tarif bunga per bulan yang ditetapkan oleh Menteri Keuangan», a monthly rate determined by the Minister of Finance, and article 9 paragraph (2c) gives the formula: «suku bunga acuan ditambah 5% (lima persen) dan dibagi 12 (dua belas)» — the reference interest rate plus five per cent, divided by twelve — taken at the rate in force on the day the sanction calculation begins. Interest is charged for at most twenty-four months, and part of a month counts as a whole month. A late return can also draw a formal reminder, the «Surat Teguran» of article 3 paragraph (5a), which is a step in the procedure rather than a charge.
Proof of filing
The electronic filing receipt issued by the tax authority (Bukti Penerimaan Elektronik) with its receipt number, kept together with the payment slip and the state revenue transaction number for the tax paid before filing.
Primary source: Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (UU 6/1983 as last amended), article 3 paragraph (3) letter c: «untuk Surat Pemberitahuan Tahunan Pajak Penghasilan Wajib Pajak badan, paling lama 4 (empat) bulan setelah akhir Tahun Pajak»; article 3 paragraph (4) and (5) on the two-month extension and the provisional computation; article 3 paragraph (5a) on the «Surat Teguran»; article 7 paragraph (1) on the fine of «Rp1.000.000,00 (satu juta rupiah)»; article 9 paragraph (2) on payment before filing, and paragraphs (2a), (2b) and (2c) on the monthly interest rate «yang ditetapkan oleh Menteri Keuangan», computed as «suku bunga acuan ditambah 5% (lima persen) dan dibagi 12 (dua belas)» for at most 24 months. Consolidated text (Susunan dalam Satu Naskah) published by the Directorate General of Taxes, Ministry of Finance. The earlier two-per-cent monthly rate appears in the text of Law 28/2007 at https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/29510/UU-Nomor-28-Tahun-2007 and is not relied on
checked 2026-10-12 · Rechecked every 24 months

Registration for VAT: report the business to be confirmed as a taxable entrepreneur (pengukuhan sebagai Pengusaha Kena Pajak)

Formula, not a date
Filed to
The Directorate General of Taxes, through the tax office at which the company is registered or through the authority's electronic registration service. What the company files is a report of its own business — the law's wording is «melaporkan usahanya untuk dikukuhkan», to report its business in order to be confirmed — and what it receives in return is the authority's confirmation. The step is a status change rather than a return: from the confirmation onwards the company charges and accounts for value added tax and files the monthly return recorded separately on this page.
Who it applies to
Only above a threshold — turnover > 4,800,000,000 IDR
The threshold is one figure and two measures. The regulation of the Minister of Finance defines a small entrepreneur as one whose supplies of taxable goods and services in a book year do not exceed «Rp4.800.000.000,00 (empat miliar delapan ratus juta rupiah)», and it measures that by «jumlah peredaran bruto dan/atau penerimaan bruto» — gross turnover and/or gross receipts, whichever applies to the business. The duty arises when the figure is passed, not when the year ends: article 4 paragraph (1) speaks of the month within the book year in which the running total «melebihi» — exceeds — the amount, which is why the test recorded here is a strict excess and not equality. The underlying obligation is in article 3A paragraph (1) of the VAT Law, which requires an entrepreneur making taxable supplies to report its business for confirmation «kecuali pengusaha kecil yang batasannya ditetapkan oleh Menteri Keuangan» — except a small entrepreneur, whose threshold the Minister of Finance sets. Two points that follow from the provisions read. A company below the threshold may still ask to be confirmed, and once confirmed it takes on the monthly return and the charging duty in full. And an exempt supply is not a taxable supply: the figure is measured on taxable supplies, so a business whose output is outside the tax does not approach the threshold by growing.
Deadline
The deadline is the end of the month after the month in which the threshold was passed. Article 4 paragraph (2) of the regulation states it without a calendar date: the duty to report the business for confirmation «dilakukan paling lama akhir bulan berikutnya setelah bulan saat jumlah peredaran bruto dan/atau penerimaan brutonya melebihi Rp4.800.000.000,00». So the date exists and is objective, but only the company knows it, because only the company knows in which month its running total crossed the figure. Read the formula with the book year in mind: the running total is measured within the company's own book year, so a company on a non-calendar year counts from its own year start, not from January.
No date can be derived here. This deadline runs from something this page does not know — the financial year the company itself elects, or an event only you can date. What is published is the rule, not the day.
If missed
No flat fine for registering late appears in the provisions read, and none is invented here: the fields below are empty on purpose. What the provisions read do produce is a worse outcome than a fine, and it is worth stating plainly. Registration is backdated in substance rather than forgiven: the tax authority may confirm an entrepreneur as taxable of its own motion, and from the point at which the duty arose the company was required to charge value added tax on its taxable supplies. The consequences then attach to each monthly period it should have filed — the fine of «Rp500.000,00 (lima ratus ribu rupiah)» per monthly VAT return under article 7 paragraph (1) of the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures, and interest on the unpaid tax at the monthly rate determined by the Minister of Finance under article 9 paragraph (2a), computed under article 9 paragraph (2c) as the reference rate plus five per cent divided by twelve, for at most twenty-four months. The commercial sting is separate from all of that and is not a sanction at all: tax that should have been charged to customers and was not is usually unrecoverable from them after the fact.
Proof of filing
The letter of confirmation as a taxable entrepreneur issued by the tax office (Surat Pengukuhan Pengusaha Kena Pajak), which carries the date from which the status runs, kept with the monthly turnover record that shows the month in which the threshold was passed.
Primary source: Regulation of the Minister of Finance 197/PMK.03/2013 amending Regulation 68/PMK.03/2010 on the threshold for small entrepreneurs for value added tax, article 1 paragraph (1): «pengusaha yang selama 1 (satu) tahun buku melakukan penyerahan Barang Kena Pajak dan/atau Jasa Kena Pajak dengan jumlah peredaran bruto dan/atau penerimaan bruto tidak lebih dari Rp4.800.000.000,00 (empat miliar delapan ratus juta rupiah)»; article 4 paragraph (1) on the duty once the running total «melebihi Rp4.800.000.000,00»; article 4 paragraph (2): «dilakukan paling lama akhir bulan berikutnya setelah bulan saat jumlah peredaran bruto dan/atau penerimaan brutonya melebihi Rp4.800.000.000,00». Full text served by the Legal Documentation and Information Network of the Ministry of Finance. The underlying duty is article 3A paragraph (1) of the Value Added Tax Law (UU 8/1983 as amended by UU 42/2009): «kecuali pengusaha kecil yang batasannya ditetapkan oleh Menteri Keuangan, wajib melaporkan usahanya untuk dikukuhkan sebagai Pengusaha Kena Pajak», at https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/api/download/7ba0c9a6-d0dd-4d7f-a8a8-b4099b3c321c/42TAHUN2009UU.pdf . The amount of Rp4.800.000.000,00 is also stated as current on the Directorate General of Taxes' own pages, for instance at https://pajak.go.id/en/node/101879
checked 2026-10-12 · Rechecked every 12 months

Monthly value added tax return (Surat Pemberitahuan Masa Pajak Pertambahan Nilai)

Formula, not a date
Filed to
The Directorate General of Taxes, through its electronic filing service; the tax is paid to the state treasury through an appointed bank or post office. The two steps have their own deadline each and the order between them is fixed by article 15A paragraph (1): payment «harus dilakukan paling lama akhir bulan berikutnya setelah berakhirnya Masa Pajak dan sebelum Surat Pemberitahuan Masa Pajak Pertambahan Nilai disampaikan» — by the end of the following month and before the return is filed. So the last lawful day is the same for both, and on that day the payment has to come first.
Who it applies to
Only registered foreign entities
The duty follows the status, not the turnover: every entrepreneur confirmed as taxable files, from the month in which the status begins. That is why no threshold is recorded here even though the status itself is reached by a threshold — the figure belongs to the registration record on this page, and repeating it here would wrongly suggest that a confirmed company below Rp4.800.000.000,00 stops filing. It does not. The same point cuts the other way for a company that registered voluntarily while under the threshold: it files monthly like any other confirmed entrepreneur. A month with no taxable supplies at all does not remove the return on anything read; what the provisions read do not state is the position of a company whose confirmation has been revoked part-way through a month, and that is not asserted here.
Deadline
The deadline is the end of the month following each tax period, and nothing on this page can turn that into a single annual date. Article 15A paragraph (2) of the VAT Law says it in one line: «Surat Pemberitahuan Masa Pajak Pertambahan Nilai disampaikan paling lama akhir bulan berikutnya setelah berakhirnya Masa Pajak» — the monthly VAT return is submitted at the latest at the end of the month following the end of the Tax Period. Two consequences worth stating. This deadline is counted from the tax period and not from the financial year, so the company's choice of a book year moves nothing here — it is the one group of duties on this page that the choice of year leaves untouched. And the monthly deadline is later than the general twenty-day rule for periodic returns in article 3 paragraph (3) letter a of the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures: value added tax has its own, longer rule, and reading the twenty-day rule onto it would be ten days early every month.
No date can be derived here. This deadline runs from something this page does not know — the financial year the company itself elects, or an event only you can date. What is published is the rule, not the day.
If missed
The fine for a late monthly VAT return is a figure and it is the highest of the periodic fines: article 7 paragraph (1) of the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures imposes an administrative fine «sebesar Rp500.000,00 (lima ratus ribu rupiah) untuk Surat Pemberitahuan Masa Pajak Pertambahan Nilai», against «Rp100.000,00 (seratus ribu rupiah) untuk Surat Pemberitahuan Masa lainnya» for other periodic returns. The amount is per return, so a year of missed months multiplies it. Late payment is charged separately and no rate figure is asserted here: article 9 paragraph (2a) sets interest at «tarif bunga per bulan yang ditetapkan oleh Menteri Keuangan» — a monthly rate determined by the Minister of Finance — which article 9 paragraph (2c) computes as «suku bunga acuan ditambah 5% (lima persen) dan dibagi 12 (dua belas)», at the rate in force on the day the calculation begins, for at most twenty-four months, with part of a month counted as a whole month.
Proof of filing
The electronic filing receipt for each monthly return (Bukti Penerimaan Elektronik) with its receipt number, together with the payment slip and the state revenue transaction number for the tax paid before that return was filed.
Primary source: Value Added Tax Law (UU 8/1983 as amended by UU 42/2009), article 15A paragraph (2): «Surat Pemberitahuan Masa Pajak Pertambahan Nilai disampaikan paling lama akhir bulan berikutnya setelah berakhirnya Masa Pajak», and paragraph (1) on payment «paling lama akhir bulan berikutnya setelah berakhirnya Masa Pajak dan sebelum Surat Pemberitahuan Masa Pajak Pertambahan Nilai disampaikan». Text served by the Legal Documentation and Information Network of the Ministry of Finance. The fine of «Rp500.000,00 (lima ratus ribu rupiah)» and the interest formula are in the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures, article 7 paragraph (1) and article 9 paragraphs (2a) and (2c), consolidated text published by the Directorate General of Taxes at https://www.pajak.go.id/sites/default/files/2021-11/SDSN%20UU%20KUP%20stdtd%20UU%20HPP.pdf
checked 2026-10-12 · Rechecked every 24 months

Annual report of the board of directors and the annual general meeting of shareholders (laporan tahunan and RUPS tahunan)

Formula, not a date
Filed to
Not to a registry but to the company's own general meeting of shareholders, and through the supervisory board on the way: article 66 paragraph (1) has the board of directors submit the annual report to the general meeting «setelah ditelaah oleh Dewan Komisaris» — after it has been reviewed by the board of commissioners. The meeting that receives it is the annual general meeting of article 78 paragraph (2), and article 78 paragraph (3) requires that all the documents of the annual report be put before that meeting. One part of the package does leave the company: article 66 paragraph (4) provides that for a company required to be audited, the balance sheet and the profit and loss account «harus disampaikan kepada Menteri sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan» — must be submitted to the Minister in accordance with legislation. That onward submission has its own regime and is recorded with the audit duty on this page; no separate date for it is asserted anywhere here.
Who it applies to
Only these legal forms — Perseroan Terbatas
The duty is addressed to the limited liability company of the Company Law — the perseroan terbatas — and it carries no threshold: nothing in the articles read makes the annual report or the annual meeting depend on size, turnover or whether the company traded at all. What the report must contain is itemised rather than left to practice. Article 66 paragraph (2) lists at least: the financial statements, comprising at least the closing balance sheet of the year just ended in comparison with the preceding year, the profit and loss account for that year, the cash flow statement and the statement of changes in equity with the notes; a report on the company's activities; a report on the performance of social and environmental responsibility; the details of problems arising during the year that affected the business; a report on the supervision carried out by the board of commissioners; the names of the members of both boards; and the salaries and allowances of both boards for the year. Article 66 paragraph (3) requires the financial statements to be drawn up in accordance with financial accounting standards. One limit of this record should be read carefully. The articles relied on are those of the Company Law as they address a company having a general meeting and a board of commissioners; the simplified single-shareholder company for micro and small business introduced into Indonesian law later is not covered by anything read here, and no position on it is asserted.
Deadline
Within 6 months after the end of the financial year.
Extensions and exceptions: No extension on application appears in the articles read, and the six-month period is expressed as an outer limit rather than a date: article 66 paragraph (1) requires the annual report to go to the general meeting «dalam jangka waktu paling lambat 6 (enam) bulan setelah tahun buku Perseroan berakhir» — at the latest within six months after the company's financial year ends — and article 78 paragraph (2) uses the same words for the meeting itself: «RUPS tahunan wajib diadakan dalam jangka waktu paling lambat 6 (enam) bulan setelah tahun buku berakhir». A meeting held earlier in the period is equally in time. What the articles read do not provide is any mechanism to move the limit; what they provide instead is a remedy if the board lets it pass, which is described under what happens if it is missed.
No date can be derived here. This deadline runs from something this page does not know — the financial year the company itself elects, or an event only you can date. What is published is the rule, not the day.
If missed
No monetary amount is asserted and the fields below are empty on purpose: the articles read attach no fine to a late annual report or a late annual meeting. The consequences they do attach are of three different kinds and none is a sum of money. The first is that the shareholders can force the meeting over the board's head. Article 79 paragraph (2) lets one or more shareholders holding together at least one tenth of the voting shares, or a lower proportion if the articles of association say so, or the board of commissioners, demand that a meeting be convened, the demand going to the board by registered mail with its reasons under paragraph (3); and if the board and the commissioners do not convene it, article 80 paragraph (1) lets the shareholder petition the chairman of the district court for leave to convene it, the court being able under paragraph (3) to set the form, the agenda, the notice, the quorum, the voting and the chair of that meeting and to order the boards to attend. The second is personal exposure for the content rather than the timing: under article 69 paragraph (3), where the financial statements provided turn out to be untrue or misleading, the members of the board of directors and of the board of commissioners are jointly and severally liable to the party harmed, and paragraph (4) releases a member who proves the fault was not his. The third is that the package can simply fail to be ratified: article 68 paragraph (2) provides that where the audit duty is not met, the financial statements are not ratified by the general meeting, which leaves the year open with the consequences that follow for anything built on approved accounts.
Proof of filing
The minutes of the annual general meeting recording the approval of the annual report and the ratification of the financial statements, together with the annual report itself signed by all members of the board of directors and of the board of commissioners in office for the year as article 67 paragraph (1) requires, and any written statement of reasons from a member who did not sign.
Primary source: Company Law (Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas), article 66 paragraph (1): «Direksi menyampaikan laporan tahunan kepada RUPS setelah ditelaah oleh Dewan Komisaris dalam jangka waktu paling lambat 6 (enam) bulan setelah tahun buku Perseroan berakhir»; article 66 paragraph (2) letters a to g on the contents; article 66 paragraph (3) on financial accounting standards; article 66 paragraph (4): «harus disampaikan kepada Menteri sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan»; article 67 paragraph (1) on signature by all members of both boards; article 68 paragraph (2) on non-ratification where the audit duty is unmet; article 69 paragraphs (3) and (4) on joint and several liability for untrue or misleading financial statements; article 78 paragraphs (1) to (4): «RUPS tahunan wajib diadakan dalam jangka waktu paling lambat 6 (enam) bulan setelah tahun buku berakhir»; articles 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) and 80 paragraphs (1) to (3) on a shareholder demand to convene and the petition to the chairman of the district court. Text served by the regulation database of the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan). The articles read do not define «tahun buku» and do not state where the financial year is fixed
checked 2026-10-12 · Rechecked every 24 months

Statutory audit of the financial statements by a public accountant, and submission of the balance sheet and profit and loss account to the Minister

Formula, not a date
Filed to
Three addressees in sequence, and only the last of them is the state. The financial statements go first to a public accountant: article 68 paragraph (1) obliges the board of directors to «menyerahkan laporan keuangan Perseroan kepada akuntan publik untuk diaudit» — to hand the company's financial statements to a public accountant for audit. The audit report then goes to the general meeting, and not directly: article 68 paragraph (3) requires it to be «disampaikan secara tertulis kepada RUPS melalui Direksi», submitted in writing to the general meeting through the board of directors. Finally, for a company that falls within this duty, article 66 paragraph (4) requires the balance sheet and the profit and loss account to be submitted to the Minister in accordance with legislation. A fourth step applies only to part of the group: article 68 paragraph (4) requires a company within letters a, b or c of paragraph (1) to publish its balance sheet and profit and loss account in one newspaper, and paragraph (5) sets that publication at «paling lambat 7 (tujuh) hari setelah mendapat pengesahan RUPS» — at the latest seven days after ratification by the general meeting.
Who it applies to
Only above a threshold — assets or turnover ≥ 50,000,000,000 IDR
The threshold recorded here is one of six independent triggers, and it is one figure measured on either of two quantities. Article 68 paragraph (1) obliges the audit where: the company's business is to collect and/or manage funds from the public (letter a); the company has issued debt acknowledgements to the public (letter b); the company is a public company (letter c); the company is a persero, a state-owned limited company (letter d); the company «mempunyai aset dan/atau jumlah peredaran usaha dengan jumlah nilai paling sedikit Rp50.000.000.000,00 (lima puluh miliar rupiah)» — has assets and/or a volume of business of at least fifty billion rupiah (letter e); or an audit is required by legislation (letter f). Letter e is the limb recorded in the threshold field, and the wording matters twice over. It is «dan/atau», and/or: assets alone will do it, turnover alone will do it, and a company need not pass both. And it is «paling sedikit», at least, which is why the test recorded is not-less-than rather than strict excess. That is also why the metric here is assets-or-turnover rather than either one by itself: a record that printed only turnover would tell a company whose balance sheet alone crosses the line that the audit does not concern it. One further feature of the figure deserves notice. Article 68 paragraph (6) provides that a reduction of the amount in letter e is to be fixed by Government Regulation, so the number can be moved downward by subordinate legislation without the Law being amended, and that is the reason this record is marked as the kind that goes out of date rather than the kind that sits still.
Deadline
Within 6 months after the end of the financial year.
Extensions and exceptions: The six months recorded here are not the audit's own deadline, and that distinction should be read before the figure is relied on. Article 68 gives the audit duty no date of its own: it says what must be audited and who receives the report, not by when. The six months come from the duties the audit has to be ready for — article 66 paragraph (1), which puts the annual report including the financial statements before the general meeting at the latest within six months after the financial year ends, and article 78 paragraph (2), which fixes the same outer limit for the meeting itself. Article 68 paragraph (2) is what makes that limit binding in practice rather than advisory: where the audit duty is not met, «laporan keuangan tidak disahkan oleh RUPS» — the financial statements are not ratified by the general meeting. So the audit has to be finished in time for a meeting that itself has to be held within six months, which is a derived outer limit and not a statutory date, and that is why it is recorded as indicative. No extension mechanism appears in the articles read. The one express date in article 68 belongs to a different step and only to part of the group: the newspaper publication under paragraph (4), due under paragraph (5) within seven days after ratification by the meeting.
No date can be derived here. This deadline runs from something this page does not know — the financial year the company itself elects, or an event only you can date. What is published is the rule, not the day.
If missed
No monetary amount is asserted and the fields below are empty on purpose: the articles read set no fine for failing to have the financial statements audited. The sanction is structural and, for a company that needs approved accounts, more expensive than a fine. Article 68 paragraph (2) states it in a single line: «Dalam hal kewajiban sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) tidak dipenuhi, laporan keuangan tidak disahkan oleh RUPS» — where the duty is not met, the financial statements are not ratified by the general meeting. Unratified accounts leave the year open, and everything that is built on approved accounts is built on nothing: a dividend resolution, a release of the boards, a bank covenant or a tender that requires audited statements. Beyond that the liability of article 69 paragraph (3) remains available to a party harmed by financial statements that turn out to be untrue or misleading, with the escape of paragraph (4) for a member who proves the fault was not his. What the articles read do not contain is any penalty attached to the submission of the balance sheet and profit and loss account to the Minister under article 66 paragraph (4), because that article refers the matter on to legislation that was not read for this record; nothing about that step's sanction is asserted here.
Proof of filing
The public accountant's audit report on the financial statements, submitted in writing to the general meeting through the board of directors, together with the meeting's resolution ratifying the statements; and, for a company within letters a, b or c of article 68 paragraph (1), the copy of the newspaper carrying the published balance sheet and profit and loss account with its date of publication.
Primary source: Company Law (Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas), article 68 paragraph (1): «Direksi wajib menyerahkan laporan keuangan Perseroan kepada akuntan publik untuk diaudit apabila», with letters a to f, letter e reading «mempunyai aset dan/atau jumlah peredaran usaha dengan jumlah nilai paling sedikit Rp50.000.000.000,00 (lima puluh miliar rupiah)»; paragraph (2): «Dalam hal kewajiban sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) tidak dipenuhi, laporan keuangan tidak disahkan oleh RUPS»; paragraph (3) on the report going «secara tertulis kepada RUPS melalui Direksi»; paragraphs (4) and (5) on newspaper publication «paling lambat 7 (tujuh) hari setelah mendapat pengesahan RUPS»; paragraph (6) providing that a reduction of the amount in letter e is fixed by Government Regulation. The six-month outer limit is derived from article 66 paragraph (1) and article 78 paragraph (2) of the same Law and is not stated in article 68. Article 66 paragraph (4) requires the balance sheet and profit and loss account of a company subject to audit to be submitted to the Minister «sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan»; the subordinate legislation that sets the channel and the date for that submission was not read. Text served by the regulation database of the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan)
checked 2026-10-12 · Rechecked every 12 months

Annual update of the beneficial owner information (pengkinian informasi Pemilik Manfaat)

Formula, not a date
Filed to
The ministry responsible for legal affairs, which is the competent authority for a limited liability company: article 13 paragraph (2) letter a of the Presidential Regulation names «Kementerian yang menyelenggarakan urusan pemerintahan di bidang hukum untuk perseroan terbatas, yayasan, dan perkumpulan» — the ministry handling government affairs in the field of law, for limited liability companies, foundations and associations — while cooperatives go to the ministry for cooperatives and small and medium enterprises and limited partnerships, general partnerships and other forms go to the ministry for trade. Filing is electronic. Article 19 paragraph (3) of the Presidential Regulation routes the information through the corporate administration service system, and the later ministerial regulation on verification and supervision speaks of beneficial owner information and questionnaires «yang disampaikan Korporasi secara elektronik berdasarkan penilaian risiko» — submitted electronically by the corporation on a risk-assessed basis. The submission is not bare data: article 18 paragraph (2) requires it to be accompanied by a statement from the corporation, and article 18 paragraph (3) limits who may lodge it to the founders or management, a notary, or another party they authorise.
Who it applies to
Every entity in the jurisdiction
Every corporation is caught, with no threshold and no exemption by size. Article 2 paragraph (2) of the Presidential Regulation lists the forms covered — «perseroan terbatas», «yayasan», «perkumpulan», «koperasi», «persekutuan komanditer», «persekutuan firma» and «bentuk korporasi lainnya», other corporate forms — and article 1 number 1 defines a corporation broadly as «kumpulan orang dan/atau kekayaan yang terorganisasi, baik merupakan badan hukum maupun bukan badan hukum», an organised collection of persons and/or assets, whether or not a legal person. The annual update recorded here is the third of three distinct duties and the only recurring one, so the other two should be read alongside it. First, determining the beneficial owner at all: article 3 paragraph (1), «Setiap Korporasi wajib menetapkan Pemilik Manfaat dari Korporasi», and article 14, which requires the corporation to apply the know-your-beneficial-owner principle and to appoint an officer or employee to do so and to produce the information on request from the competent authority and from law enforcement. Second, the initial submission: article 19 paragraph (2) requires a corporation to determine and submit the information «paling lama 7 (tujuh) hari kerja» — within seven working days — counted from its receipt of its business licence or registration certificate. Third, changes: article 20 paragraph (2) requires any change in the beneficial owner information to be reported «paling lama 3 (tiga) hari kerja sejak terjadinya perubahan», within three working days of the change. The annual update does not replace the three-day duty for changes; it runs alongside it, and a year in which nothing changed still carries the update. A separate record-keeping duty sits in article 22, which requires documents to be kept for at least five years.
Deadline
Once every year, counted from the corporation's own last submission, and not on a date the calendar supplies. Article 21 of the Presidential Regulation is one sentence long: «Korporasi wajib melakukan pengkinian informasi Pemilik Manfaat secara berkala setiap 1 (satu) tahun» — the corporation must update the beneficial owner information periodically, once every year. The later ministerial regulation repeats the same cycle in its own list of duties, «pengkinian informasi Pemilik Manfaat secara berkala setiap 1 (satu) tahun sekali». Neither instrument names a month or a day, and neither ties the cycle to the financial year or to the date of incorporation; what it is tied to, on the words used, is the running of a year. So the objective date exists and only the corporation holds the input needed to compute it: the date of its own previous submission or update. For a corporation that has never updated, the clock starts from the initial submission under article 19 paragraph (2). One warning worth carrying: a change reported in the middle of a year is governed by its own three-working-day deadline and nothing read says that such a report resets the annual cycle, so it should not be assumed to.
No date can be derived here. This deadline runs from something this page does not know — the financial year the company itself elects, or an event only you can date. What is published is the rule, not the day.
If missed
No monetary amount is asserted, and that is not for want of a sanction: the sanction here is operational and bites harder than most fines. The Presidential Regulation itself is open-ended — article 24 provides that a corporation failing to comply with the duties of articles 3, 14 and 18 to 22 «dikenai sanksi sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan», is subject to sanctions under the applicable legislation — so no figure can be taken from it. The later ministerial regulation on the verification and supervision of beneficial owners is where the consequence becomes concrete. It applies sanctions to a corporation that fails to report beneficial owner information or submits false information, and lists three: a warning, blacklisting, and the blocking of the corporation's access to the ministry's online corporate administration system, the blocking being defined as «dilakukan dalam bentuk penutupan akses Korporasi pada AHU Online» — carried out in the form of closing the corporation's access to AHU Online. The practical effect is what matters: with that access closed the corporation cannot transact the ordinary ministry business that depends on it, such as filing changes to its deed, its management or its shareholdings. The sanctions are imposed in tiers, though the regulation allows a tier to be skipped in certain cases, and a corporation already blocked or blacklisted stays in that state until it complies. No amount of money appears in any of this, which is why the fields below are empty.
Proof of filing
The electronic receipt issued by the ministry's corporate administration system for the annual update, kept with the corporation's own statement that accompanies the submission under article 18 paragraph (2) and with the internal record identifying the officer or employee appointed under article 14 paragraph (2).
Primary source: Presidential Regulation 13 of 2018 on the application of the principle of knowing the beneficial owner of a corporation (Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018), article 21: «Korporasi wajib melakukan pengkinian informasi Pemilik Manfaat secara berkala setiap 1 (satu) tahun»; article 1 numbers 1 and 2 on the definitions of «Korporasi» and «Pemilik Manfaat»; article 2 paragraph (2) on the forms covered; article 3 paragraph (1); article 13 paragraph (2) letter a naming «Kementerian yang menyelenggarakan urusan pemerintahan di bidang hukum untuk perseroan terbatas, yayasan, dan perkumpulan»; article 14; article 18 paragraphs (1) to (3); article 19 paragraphs (2) and (3) on the «paling lama 7 (tujuh) hari kerja» initial submission; article 20 paragraph (2) on changes «paling lama 3 (tiga) hari kerja sejak terjadinya perubahan»; article 22 on five-year record keeping; article 24 on sanctions «sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan». The text is served as a scanned document by the regulation database of the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan). The annual cycle and the sanctions of warning, blacklisting and «penutupan akses Korporasi pada AHU Online» are also set out in Regulation of the Minister of Law 2 of 2025 on the verification and supervision of corporate beneficial owners (Peraturan Menteri Hukum Nomor 2 Tahun 2025), articles 3, 4, 11, 22 to 24 and 26, at https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/375763/Permenkum%20Nomor%202%20Tahun%202025.pdf . Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights 15 of 2019 on the procedure for applying the principle is recorded as in force by the same database
checked 2026-10-12 · Rechecked every 6 months
← All jurisdictions